Back                                            Ann Coulter:  A page of her own

Ann Coulter, Syndicated columnist & editorial Writer whose editorials I've read in the Trentonian Newspaper (Trenton N. J.) & the paper itself  The paper for printing anything detrimental to the Democratic Party weather it's proven or not, while not mentioning anything bad about The Republican or if so downplaying it. Ann Coulter for calling herself a Journalist. The other day she made a big deal about Sandy Berger taking documents out of the National Archives. She asserted that he had stolen the documents, even agreeing that the people (who by the way haven't been named) were telling the truth. That's including the person who claimed he saw Sandy stuff documents in his socks. Read Sandy Burger But incase you don't, let me make a point. I feel that if someone saw such an act, Burger wouldn't have gotten 10 feet from his table before being stopped. If the person didn't stop him or at least notified someone in charge, would that person, at a later date, report that they hadn't done their job. She also neglected to mention that the F.B.I. had, a few days before, stopped the investigation & would not be pressing any charges against Burger. Funny thing after 4 years of whitewater no charges were pressed against Bill Clinton either. Since they couldn't find any thing to charge Sandy Burger with her article is no more then slander. She has done this type of reporting many times in the past. For their assault on honesty and the integrity of the press I give both of them ****

Ann Coulter: gets **** more for saying that Dan Rather used falsified documents in his report on George Bush National Guard record. I agree with her statements, only she exempts herself. She used unfounded information when she libeled Sandy Burger & even when the F. B. I. dropped the case for lack of evidence, saying that no law was broken & no charges would be filed, she never apologized for her misrepresentation. Have you ever seen her give the benefit of doubt to a democrat, as she consistently does for republicans. This chick should get 10 * as I've never seen a bigger Hypocrite, but I said I only give 4 stars. Don't these people have mirrors?

Ann Coulter: Syndicated columnist & editorial writer is at it again this time for asserting that she knows who is telling the truth & who is lying about John Kerry's war record, read crossfire on the last page under Robert Novak. This so called reporter will write anything she can to damage a democratic candidate & it doesn't matter if it's true or not. She has no way of knowing who is telling the truth in this case, but let me make the point that John E. O'Neill co-author of the book, under pressure on Crossfire admitted that he never met Kerry in Vietnam as Kerry had left before O'Neill got there. She says that 250 Swift Boat members signed a letter. Do you really believe that that many men would have met a person in the conditions that were Vietnam at that time. All the men who served on his boat have praised his actions. So even if she's right she's still a Hypocrite for making it seem like she personally knows what the truth is. Let's face facts she is one of the reasons that America is as divided as it is today. I thought that George Bush was going to unite the country. Maybe we should change that famous quite from "United we stand." to "Divided we stand." at least till we get rid of Bush.  I wonder how much credence she gives to the other co-author Jerome Corsi just click on his name to see some of the things he said. Like  CORSI: "So this is what the last days of the Catholic Church are going to look like. Buggering boys undermines the moral base and the lawyers rip the gold off the Vatican altars. We may get one more Pope, when this senile one dies, but that's probably about it." Is this the kind of man you want to listen to? Ann Coulter does.

8/19/04 More proof that Ann Coulter could have been wrong, something I know she'll refute. Larry Thurlow's Military records were inspected by the Washington Post under the (freedom of information Act) (Larry Thurlow is one of the most vocal critics of John Kerry) & guess what? He also received a  Bronze Star for his actions during the same event he claims never happened. Read this. He now claims that John Kerry wrote the post action report, & that he never read it, but he accepted the award and never questioned what was in the report apparently none of the veterans of the action did. The Washington Post could find no information on who wrote the report but say that some of the information in the report took place during the time when Kerry's boat was down stream & John couldn't have known just what went on during that time. John Kerry denies writing that report. One of the largest contributors to the swift boat veterans is Bob Perry a huge contributor to the George Bush Campaign. 8/20/04 The New York Times ran a chart showing a possible link from the Bush campaign to the Swift Boat Veterans. One that I must say seems more credible to me then say, the connection of Saddam Hussein to al-Qu'ida.

8/20/04 She's at it again. If it wasn't for hate Ann Coulter like Rush Limbaugh wouldn't have a job. She doesn't have the intelligence to do the research for her editorials. She just listens to people who agree with her. I at least let you know that what I write is my opinion then give you my reasons for those believes & in most cases links to information you can use to try and figure out what the exact facts are. I don't know if we had forces in Cambodia or not during John Kerry's tour of duty in Vietnam but since the North Vietnamese did it's possible that we might have crossed the border in hot pursuit. I do know that Richard Nixon, on April 30th 1970, announced to the nation that we were sending troops into Cambodia. This after we had been bombing Communist supple routes & base camps in Cambodia in "Operation Breakfast." since 1969. These actions perpetuated the rise of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. For Ann anything that may hurt the democratic party, weather proven or not, is reason to write a editorial condemning them. She should look for honest employment.

One of the far right wings angels is Ann Coulter and she is one who I'd like to debunk. I don't know how well you know her but if you've read anything she has ever written, or seen her on TV or in person, you know she is full of venom and extreme hate for any and all Democrats. She will spew and amount of distortions to make her point. An Example of her distortions can be seen in a recent column she wrote. The column was dated 8/25/06:

"This years Democratic plan for the future is another inane sound bite designed to trick the American voters into trusting them with national security."  People, if you've been following the senate you'll know that not only has the 9/11 commission recommendations not been implemented but that the Bush administration and the Republican Congress have cut national security spending everywhere they could.

"To wit, they're claiming there is no connection between the war on terror and war in Iraq, and while they're all for the war against terror - absolutely in favor of that war - They are adamantly opposed to the war in Iraq. You know, the war where the U.S. military is killing thousands upon thousands of terrorists (described in the media as 'Iraqi civilians, " even if they are from Jordon, like the now dead leader of al-Qaida, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi). That war.  Oh, so they're not mostly insurgents and the new terrorists coming into the country weren't created by our action in going into Iraq in the first place. Then I guess the independent 9-11 Commission is wrong again. I'm glad Ann is so intelligent or I'd still be in the dark. People the misinformation Ann Coulter spews is so profoundly inaccurate it's almost laughable. Let's continue.

"As Howard Dean put it this week. 'The occupation in Iraq is costing American lives and hampering our ability to fight the real global war on terror.' This would be like complaining that Roosevelt's war in Germany was hampering our ability to fight the real global was on fascism. Or anti-discrimination laws were hampering our ability to fight the real war on racism. Or dusting is hampering our ability to fight the real war on dust.

People let's face the real facts: Most of the terror in Iraq right now is according to our own Generals and the new Iraqi government, is not international terrorists but secular violence, bordering on civil war and yes, we are distracted from the real threat of Terrorism.

Since we went into Iraq there have been Terror attacks across the world, all attacking western interests and people. Cells have attacked in Spain, Great Britain, Turkey, Bali, Indonesia, Italy, Israel, and plans were broken up in Canada and other places. The people of the Arab streets have flocked to the great cause of defending Iraq against America and in doing so trained for terror missions across the world.

We pulled a large portion of our troops out of Afghanistan hampering our chances of catching Bin Ladin

We have cut back on defense spending in order to fund the war. Our ports, chemical and nuclear plants, our railroads and transportation systems, power grids, yes and even our borders are willfully under funded. Our first line defenders still can't communicate with each other.

What Ann Coulter doesn't seem to understand (Because she is blinded by hate.) is that the Democrats have been trying (Unsuccessfully, because of the Republican Party's opposition.) to strengthen all of the things I just mentioned and her comparisons were stupid. Italy (Fascism) Germany (Nazism) and Japan were allies. Islamic terrorism is spread throughout the world and Iraq was if anything a buffer against Iran and Syria two countries who definitely support terror. The most dangerous Moslems are the Shiite who were under the heavy foot of Saddam Hussein. Now they are free to join Iran or al-Quida in their fight against us.

She goes on to condemn the Democrats for asking that the Patriot Act be reviewed before being renewed. Not one person in either house said it shouldn't exist only that it may have needed changes to protect the rights of Americans and should be reviewed. If we have been watching how the Executive Branch has been withholding information from the House and Senate, classifying almost everything. You'll realize just how dangerous to much power in to few peoples hands can be.

If you want real information on the house or senate, watch the debates and the votes of both houses on C-Span and C-Span 2. Listen then decide. Your safety may depend on it.     Al

Oct. 18th 2006: Let's blame Clinton. Claming the Democrats would do anything to talk about anything but North Korea (referring to the break down of the lies about the Republican ethics. She of course refers to Bill Clinton's affair with Monica {Even though she was a consulting adult.}). She also blames Bill Clinton for North Korea's testing of a nuclear devise. She uses distortions, misinformation and out right lies to make her point.

She tells her readers that the Democrats are using bold face lies regarding the administration's deal with North Korea, when in fact she is the one who is either lying or at the very least misleading the public. Here is the actual agreement  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreed_Framework

In paragraph 7 of her article she claims that the agreement allows for no inspectors for five years. This is that is in the agreement    (IAEA ad hoc and routine inspections would resume for facilities not subject to the freeze.)

She says our Asian allies were furious and that Hans Blix thought we were being "Patsies" I recently saw Hans Blix on CNN praising the agreement.

She mumbles on and on distorting the facts. Take the time to use a little common sense. Read what I wrote: http://www.legongventures.com/northkorea.htm  You my not agree with what I said but at least I explained my reasoning. and I lead you to the facts I had based my assessment on.   AL